Robert Argiz, et al.
rargiz@gmail.com
September 19, 2009.
Gerald and Kate McCann
Rothley, Leicester. Britain
Mr. and Mrs. McCann:
Having obtained a favourable judicial decision against the infamous campaign by Goncalo Amaral aimed at both of you, and with the purpose of sidetracking the attention from focussing on the truth of the case related to your daughter Madeleine, is important as it helps to debunk the ridiculous and fallacious theory that she died in the room and that you disappeared her body, all with the intent to cover up on behalf of others what he truthfully knows regarding the kidnapping of your daughter.
At this point, there is not a valid reason to get tired of repeating as many times as necessary that Goncalo Amaral and his associates know the truth related to the abduction of your daughter Madeleine. This assertion is made on the basis of extra knowledge acquired by subjects who were closer to inner Portuguese circles, wherein prominent social figures identified with the well-known entrenched paedophilia under world there, were the source of related information. Despite not being able to show tangible evidence to prove this it is nevertheless guaranteed not to be a mere subjective opinion. There are worthy objective reasons linked to the personal conduct of individuals arising from the idiosyncrasies of too many Portuguese men in the officialdom range, who are deeply involved in the realm of perversion within a country famously awash with hard-core paedophiles, and Goncalo Amaral has first-hand knowledge and information on them. He should become a subject of interest to the investigators. It is understandable that you may prefer to shun this reality as a valid element with which to look into it or investigate the mysterious disappearance of Madeleine, but when and if you do, an important and evident component of the entire matter is being overlooked. Should there be any doubts regarding the validity of this element embodied in the person of Goncalo Amaral, all you would have to do is look at the background of his performance since he was assigned to the case by then police chief Paulo Cristovao after Madeleine was abducted. If you did this, inevitably you will soon or later, encounter an assortment of meaningful reasons that will give you hints and contribute to enlighten you in understanding with clarity the dimension and depth of this terrible crime committed against Madeleine and you as parents. The abduction of your daughter was a well-planned operation for specific reasons and by whomever in inner Portuguese officialdom circles, on behalf of one or more very powerful individuals in the elite class. It would be naive to think otherwise. I can't send you prima facie evidence to show you but I know this is what happened and Goncalo Amaral knows the truth he was able to distort very effectively for the purpose of obtaining the desired results. His book is the ultimate manifestation of the success in twisting reality to his advantage, while protecting the interests of those on behalf of whom the abduction of Madeleine was executed with precision. She will not be found by using conventional investigative methods. Most or all child abductions within Portugal, were linked either directly or indirectly to the officialdom, and were meant to be permanent and irreversible thanks to their structure unofficially used to protect the real culprits when they periodically occur. In the history of child abduction in that country not one was found and though this does not sound encouraging it is the reality. Portugal does not have a high rate of child abduction like the United States or Britain do where kids go missing every day.
The judicial decision to ban Goncalo Amaral's book and DVD is in itself a positive step forward towards the possibility of uncovering the plot-like conspiracy aimed at suppressing the truth of an unsolved crime. His book should not be taken seriously because it is an unproved statement, put forward as a premise in an argument over something that has not been shown with solid evidence. He insists that Madeleine is dead as a result of you actions, but there is not a cadaver to prove his unfounded and fallacious claims. Again, he wrote a book and conducted a fake "investigation" of the crime only to give apparent legitimacy to something he knew was false and intended only to be a cover up.
Mr. and Mrs. McCann:
Having obtained a favourable judicial decision against the infamous campaign by Goncalo Amaral aimed at both of you, and with the purpose of sidetracking the attention from focussing on the truth of the case related to your daughter Madeleine, is important as it helps to debunk the ridiculous and fallacious theory that she died in the room and that you disappeared her body, all with the intent to cover up on behalf of others what he truthfully knows regarding the kidnapping of your daughter.
At this point, there is not a valid reason to get tired of repeating as many times as necessary that Goncalo Amaral and his associates know the truth related to the abduction of your daughter Madeleine. This assertion is made on the basis of extra knowledge acquired by subjects who were closer to inner Portuguese circles, wherein prominent social figures identified with the well-known entrenched paedophilia under world there, were the source of related information. Despite not being able to show tangible evidence to prove this it is nevertheless guaranteed not to be a mere subjective opinion. There are worthy objective reasons linked to the personal conduct of individuals arising from the idiosyncrasies of too many Portuguese men in the officialdom range, who are deeply involved in the realm of perversion within a country famously awash with hard-core paedophiles, and Goncalo Amaral has first-hand knowledge and information on them. He should become a subject of interest to the investigators. It is understandable that you may prefer to shun this reality as a valid element with which to look into it or investigate the mysterious disappearance of Madeleine, but when and if you do, an important and evident component of the entire matter is being overlooked. Should there be any doubts regarding the validity of this element embodied in the person of Goncalo Amaral, all you would have to do is look at the background of his performance since he was assigned to the case by then police chief Paulo Cristovao after Madeleine was abducted. If you did this, inevitably you will soon or later, encounter an assortment of meaningful reasons that will give you hints and contribute to enlighten you in understanding with clarity the dimension and depth of this terrible crime committed against Madeleine and you as parents. The abduction of your daughter was a well-planned operation for specific reasons and by whomever in inner Portuguese officialdom circles, on behalf of one or more very powerful individuals in the elite class. It would be naive to think otherwise. I can't send you prima facie evidence to show you but I know this is what happened and Goncalo Amaral knows the truth he was able to distort very effectively for the purpose of obtaining the desired results. His book is the ultimate manifestation of the success in twisting reality to his advantage, while protecting the interests of those on behalf of whom the abduction of Madeleine was executed with precision. She will not be found by using conventional investigative methods. Most or all child abductions within Portugal, were linked either directly or indirectly to the officialdom, and were meant to be permanent and irreversible thanks to their structure unofficially used to protect the real culprits when they periodically occur. In the history of child abduction in that country not one was found and though this does not sound encouraging it is the reality. Portugal does not have a high rate of child abduction like the United States or Britain do where kids go missing every day.
The judicial decision to ban Goncalo Amaral's book and DVD is in itself a positive step forward towards the possibility of uncovering the plot-like conspiracy aimed at suppressing the truth of an unsolved crime. His book should not be taken seriously because it is an unproved statement, put forward as a premise in an argument over something that has not been shown with solid evidence. He insists that Madeleine is dead as a result of you actions, but there is not a cadaver to prove his unfounded and fallacious claims. Again, he wrote a book and conducted a fake "investigation" of the crime only to give apparent legitimacy to something he knew was false and intended only to be a cover up.
Robert Argiz, et al.
